5 Inventory Count Risks That Only an Auditor Can Truly Reveal

A medium-sized manufacturing company, 12 employees in the warehouse, three days of downtime. Everything counted, everything meticulously documented—just like every year. And then the auditor’s question: “How can you prove that the counting process actually took place exactly as described in the records?”

Silence fills the room.

Moments like this happen more often than inventory managers—such as financial accountants and accounting staff—would care to admit. Not because the inventory was done poorly, but because certain risks in the process remain hidden until the auditor brings them to light.

You should therefore be aware of these five risks before the auditor asks uncomfortable questions.

Risk 1: The documentation appears complete, but that’s not enough for the auditor

The auditor asks: “How can you fully trace the inventory process from the count order to the posting?”

This is the most insidious risk because it remains hidden for so long. Count sheets are available, discrepancies have been posted, and signatures have been provided. And yet the auditor concludes: Complete traceability is lacking.

Audit-proof does not just mean that results are available, but that the entire process can be reconstructed. Who counted, and when? What procedure was used to handle discrepancies? Which items were omitted, and why?

If this level of detail is missing, there’s a risk of uncomfortable follow-up questions, additional audit procedures, and recounts. In extreme cases, significant, irreparable gaps can even lead to a qualified audit opinion.

The real problem: Many companies document the results of the inventory count—not the process. The auditor examines both.

Risk 2: Inventory discrepancies that recur every year yet are never questioned

The auditor asks: “Why do inventory discrepancies repeatedly occur for the same items or storage locations?”

Minor discrepancies between book inventory and physical count are normal. But when the same items, storage locations, or cost centers produce discrepancies year after year, this is not a random problem but a systemic flaw.

Recurring discrepancies signal to the auditor that the process is not under control and that adjusting entries are becoming routine instead of addressing the root cause.

The impact on the balance sheet is direct: overvalued or undervalued inventory distorts the picture of the company’s assets. And the larger the inventory, the greater the potential impact.

The real problem: When seemingly small discrepancies become the norm, people stop treating them as a risk.

Risk 3: The financial statements are waiting for the inventory count—not the other way around

The auditor asks: “What impact did recounts and inventory discrepancies have on your financial statement preparation process?”

Tax advisors, auditors, and shareholders—everyone is waiting for the audited figures. And those figures are waiting for the inventory count. If the count takes longer than planned, recounts become necessary, or discrepancies delay the reconciliation, the entire financial statement preparation process is pushed back.

In practice, this means: overtime in accounting, pressure from management, and rushed adjusting entries right before the deadline. And sometimes: financial statements that aren’t completed within the legally required timeframe.

The real problem: The inventory count is planned as a standalone project, not as an integrated part of the financial statement preparation process with built-in buffer times.

Risk 4: Three Days of Warehouse Shutdown for Numbers That Still Don’t Add Up

The auditor asks: “How do you ensure that your inventory-taking procedure delivers reliable and complete inventory values?”

The traditional cutoff-date inventory is time-consuming. The warehouse is locked down, production is interrupted, and employees are pulled away from their day-to-day work. And then?

In many companies, the limitations only become apparent after the inventory is complete: double counts, unreported receipts shortly before the cutoff date, and items that were simply forgotten. The effort was maximal, yet the quality was still lacking. A high level of inventory effort is not a mark of quality.

For the auditor, what matters is not how much effort was expended, but whether the inventory procedure delivers reliable, traceable, and audit-proof inventory values.

The real problem: Many companies equate a high level of inventory effort with high inventory quality.

Risk 5: Always using the same inventory procedure—because no one knows the alternatives

The auditor asks: “Why did you choose this inventory procedure?”

Many companies stick to the same inventory procedure year after year because they assume that alternative procedures will not be accepted by the auditor. This assumption is often never questioned.

In fact, under certain conditions, the German Commercial Code (HGB) also permits alternative inventory procedures such as perpetual inventory or inventory by sampling. What matters is not the procedure itself, but that it is properly applied and documented in a traceable manner.

The real problem: Many companies base their decision on an inventory procedure on assumptions, not on the actual legal options available. Often, this assumption is only questioned when the auditor asks for the rationale behind the chosen inventory method.

Conclusion

These five risks have one thing in common: They are rarely recognized when they first arise, but only when the auditor inquires, the annual financial statements come under pressure, or the inventory process paralyzes the company for the third time in a row.

The most sensible first step is not to search for a new method, but to ask honestly: Where in our process are these risks currently lurking, and do we really have them under control? Those who can answer this question for themselves lay the foundation for further steps to streamline the inventory process and ensure that the inventory does not turn into a state of emergency every single year.

Which of these risks causes you the most concern when it comes to your own inventory?

Feel free to connect with me on LinkedIn and let’s exchange ideas!

You can find my profile here.